Readings and such – Week 8&9
The Drew Brophy art was pretty amazing, very interesting to
see the styles influence on many of the styles and artworks today, especially
in the colour palettes and the attention to detail.
The Warshaw article was a very in depth esoteric look at the
history of surf publications, he made plenty of declarations for the importance
of these publications and he does make the whole thing seem quite interesting
and meaningful, albeit completely alienating. As someone looking in I wonder
who this niche article is really for, as he glorifies the whole history of surf
publication as a sort of sacred text. He even pokes fun of people comparing
surf magazines to religious texts, well Warshaw manages to write for about 30
pages on the same subject, so I don’t think he can distance himself too much.
What really came across was how arbitrary the articles are, that the real power
seems to mostly be in the photography of the act rather than written
articulations.
Scott Hulet’s article on artist Thomas Campbell was a well
written and insightful look at how someone can actually make a living off
following their creative passions. I couldn’t say that I really cared for his
work but I am impressed with the almost industrious volume of work that he has
produced.
The huffington post write up on the surf industry made me
laugh because in all that we’ve been learning about all semester it seemed as
apt as the term “industry” may be, it also seems to go against the deep rooted,
spiritual ethos that many surfers try to promote. The same with competitions
and the idea of having it entered as an Olympic sport. I just feel like if this
activity is so meaningful to the masses why are they all so eager to sully it
with corporate sponsorships and gold medals. The state of surfing seems to have
given away to capitalization anyway but I really think the surfing community
needs to pick a lane. I’m sure the only way most people make any money with
surfing is teaching or corporate sponsorships but maybe that says something to
what this pastime has become? If it is truly about connecting with the ocean
and riding waves why do you need your face on a cereal box?
The article and video on the wavegarden technology seemed
like it actually worked very well and that this could be a perfect environment
for people to learn to surf without pissing of the angry locals of many spots.
On the otherhand the simplicity that many of the people were taking to makes me
wonder whether the feeling of accomplishment would lessen. I’ve only been
surfing a few times and being able to finally stand up and ride a wave was a
very proud moment, and this was in the tame waters of south England. Knowing
that a machine, rather than the planet created my wave would eliminate much of
the excitement.
Zach -
ReplyDeleteYou hit on some really foundational points in contemporary surf culture: the dichotomy between 'soul' and salaried surfers; and how the introduction of wave parks, while possessing certain advantages (training purposes and crowd control, which you mention), does not hold the same aura and sense of connection with nature that surfing oceanic waves inherently allows. Great insights and writing.
- Trey